1. Indian Anthropometric Dimensions For Ergonomic Design Practice Pdf Free
2. Indian Anthropometric Dimensions For Ergonomic Design Practice Pdf Download
3. Indian Anthropometric Dimensions For Ergonomic Design Practice Pdf Template
4. Indian Anthropometric Dimensions For Ergonomic Design Practice Pdf Download

Anthropometric dimensions for each population are ranked by size and described as percentiles. It is common practice to design for the 5th percentile (5th%) female to the 95th percentile (95th%) male. The 5th% female value for a particular dimension (e.g. Sitting height) usually represents the smallest measurement for design in a population. Jul 01, 2019.

Adejuyigbe, S.B & Ali, D.M. (2004). Ergonomic evaluation of furniture in higher institution in Nigeria, A case study of FUTA. Nigerian Journal of Industrial and System Studies (NJISS), 3(1), 24-30.
Castellucci, H. I., Arezes, P. M., & Viviani, C. A. (2010). Mismatch between classroom furniture and anthropometric measures in Chilean schools. Applied Ergonomics, 41(4), 563-568.
Chakrabarti, D. (1997). Indian anthropometric dimensions for ergonomic design practice, National Institute of Design.

Indian Anthropometric Dimensions For Ergonomic Design Practice Pdf Free

Chakrabarti, D. & Das, A. (2004). Design development of a new seat-desk unit suitable for Indian school children. Proceedings of National Conference on Humanizing Work and Work Environment, National Institute of Industrial Engineering.
Chaudhary, N., Sharma, D., Grover, R. & Nainwal, U. (2004). Mismatch between classroom furniture dimensions and student anthropometric characteristics: A study of schools of Pantnagar. Proceedings of National Conference on Humanizing Work and Work Environment, National Institute of Industrial Engineering.
Corlett, N., Wilson, J., & Manenica, I. (1986). The ergonomics of working postures: models, methods and cases. Taylor & Francis, London, 21-29.
Das, A., & Chakrabarti, D. (2004). Role of free postural adoption on performance and informal workplace design. Proceedings of National Conference on Humanizing Work and Work Environment, National Institute of Industrial Engineering, April, Mumbai.
Ermakova, S. V., Podstavkina, T. P., & Strokina, A. N. (1985). Anthropometric Atlas, Recommendations on Methods. Amerind Publishing Co. Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi, 23-123.
Gouvali, M.K. & Boudolos, K. (2006). Match between school furniture dimensions and children's anthropometry. Applied Ergonomics, 37(6), 765-773.
Hira, D.S. (1980). An ergonomic appraisal of educational desks. Ergonomics, 23, 213-221.
Indian Council of Medical Research (1989). Growth and physical development of Indian infants and children. New Delhi, 18, 1-176.
Ismaila, S. O. (2009). Anthropometric data of hand, foot, ear of university students in Nigeria. Leonard Journal of Sciences, 15, 15-20.
Jeong, B. Y. & Park, K. S. (1990). Sex differences in anthropometry for school furniture design. Ergonomics, 33, 1511-1521.
Kroemer, K. H. E. and Grandjean, E. (2001). Fitting the task to the human: A text book of occupational ergonomics. Taylor and Francis, London.
Mououdi, M. A., & Choobineh, A. R. (1997). Static anthropometric characteristics of students age range six-11 in Mazandaran province/Iran and school furniture design based on ergonomics principles. Applied Ergonomics, 28(2), 145-147
Molenbroek, J. F. M., Kroon-Ramaekers, Y. M. T. & Snijders, C. J. (2003). Revision of the design of a standard for the dimensions of school furniture. Ergonomics, 46, 681-694.
Nag, P. K. (1996). Ergonomics and work design. New Age International (P) Limited, New Delhi, 129-154.
Savanur, C. S., Ghosh, S., Dhar, U., & De, A. (2004). An ergonomic study of comparison between school classroom furniture and student’s anthropometry. Proceedings of National Conference on Humanizing Work and Work Environment, National Institute of Industrial Engineering.
Singh, I. P. & Bhasin, M.K. (1989). Anthropometry. Kamla-Raj Enterprises, Delhi.
Sane, S. M., Karandikar, V., & Savale, P. (2004). Ergonomic product design: classroom bench. Proceedings of National Conference on Humanizing Work and Work Environment, National Institute of Industrial Engineering.
Trevelyan, F. C., & Legg, S. J. (2006). Back pain in school children—Where to from here? Applied Ergonomics, 37(1), 45-54.

Indian Anthropometric Dimensions For Ergonomic Design Practice Pdf Download

Weiner, J. S. & Lourie, J. A. (1969). Human biology: A guide to field methods, IBP Hand Book No.9. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford.

Two terms are used to describe the application of scientific information about human variability and adaptability to the design process. Ergonomics (also known as Human Factors) describes information about humans in 'working' situations. Anthropometrics deals with information about human body size and shape.

As an item of furniture is rarely used by only one individual, most furniture must accommodate the variations of a wide range of end users. The 'average' person is a mythical creature. When measurements are taken from a target population for a particular design, a mid-point (termed the 50th 'percentile') divides users into two groups - one above and one below the 'average.'

Indian Anthropometric Dimensions For Ergonomic Design Practice Pdf Template

See also:

It may be logical to use this mid-point/average number to determine the height of a chair seat but not the height for the top shelf in a storage cabinet. In the latter case, it is standard practice to use a dimension that accommodates 90 to 95 percent of users who can reach an object on the top shelf. The design ideal is to provide for adjustability and use anthropometric data to determine the upper and lower limits for the range of adjustments, e.g., for workstation chairs.

Furniture designers should have a library of texts (or software) on this people).

The data may be dated (the population may be changing year over year).

Technology changes, e.g., computer keyboards have a lower profile than traditional typewriters.

Country of orgin may affect the data.

Measurements are taken with nude subjects (normally, people wear clothes and shoes at work).

The Industrial Design Engineering program at Delft's Technical University makes available a database of anthropometry. Designers can search the DINED data for human body dimensions specified by age, sex, country or other factors.

Workstation information

The design of workstations requires the application of anthropometic and egonomic data. furniturelink has provided a sample of relevant data taken from the Marine Corps study (listed above) and other sources. furniturelink added the information for the angle of sight (Z) from various sources that recommended angles between 5 and 15 degrees. For simplicity furniturelink shows the popiteal height (F) measured to the same baseline as the compressed seat height. To adjust for shoe height, add 25 mm for men or 45 mm for women (1).

Disclaimer: use this data at your own risk.

Indian Anthropometric Dimensions For Ergonomic Design Practice Pdf Download

#	Female			Male
5%	50%	95%	5%	50%	95%
A	690	743	795	739	795	850
B	181	226	266	188	235	274
C	406	439	479	447	482	520
D	438	478	525	458	499	544
E	540	585	637	569	616	665
F	352	388	428	395	434	476
G	474	513	558	515	559	605

All measurements in mm. (A) Eye height sitting (B) Elbow rest height (C) Forearm-hand length (D) Buttock-popiteal length (E) Buttock-knee length (F) Popiteal height - no shoes (G) Knee height sitting - no shoes

(1) Ergonomics by Stephen Pheasant